AgentStack
Browse Sign in
Browse Why AgentStack Sell Docs
Sign in
SKILL verified MIT Self-run

Competition Cloud Metadata Path

skill-zhaoxuya520-reverse-skill-competition-cloud-metadata-path · by zhaoxuya520

Internal downstream skill for ctf-sandbox-orchestrator. CTF-sandbox workflow for cloud metadata services, instance identity, workload identity, link-local credential paths, role assumption, and metadata-to-privilege trust edges. Use when the user asks to inspect metadata-service access, instance credentials, pod or workload identity, link-local token paths, SSRF-to-metadata escalation, or explain…

No reviews yet
0 installs
3 views
0.0% view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-zhaoxuya520-reverse-skill-competition-cloud-metadata-path

✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • Prompt-injection patterns
  • Secret / credential exfiltration
  • Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • Untrusted network calls
  • Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • Network access No
  • Filesystem access No
  • Shell / process execution No
  • Environment & secrets No
  • Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

View the full security report →

Verified badge

Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.

AgentStack Verified badge Links to your public security report.
[![AgentStack Verified](https://agentstack.voostack.com/badges/verified.svg)](https://agentstack.voostack.com/security/report/skill-zhaoxuya520-reverse-skill-competition-cloud-metadata-path)

Reliability & compatibility

Security review passed
0 installs to date
no reviews yet
1mo ago

Declared compatibility

Claude CodeClaude Desktop

Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.

Preview Execution monitoring

We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.

How agent discovery & health will work →
Are you the author of Competition Cloud Metadata Path? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

Competition Cloud Metadata Path

Use this skill only as a downstream specialization after $ctf-sandbox-orchestrator is already active and has established sandbox assumptions, node ownership, and evidence priorities. If that has not happened yet, return to $ctf-sandbox-orchestrator first.

Use this skill when the decisive edge is not just reaching metadata, but proving how metadata-derived identity becomes accepted privilege.

Reply in Simplified Chinese unless the user explicitly requests English.

Quick Start

  1. Identify which metadata surface is active: instance metadata, workload identity, node identity, task role, or platform-specific token endpoint.
  2. Record the exact reachability path: local process, pod, container, proxy, SSRF surface, or host route.
  3. Separate metadata reachability from credential issuance and from downstream privilege acceptance.
  4. Keep token format, role identity, scope, and accepting API in compact evidence blocks.
  5. Reproduce the smallest metadata-to-accepted-privilege path that proves the challenge edge.

Workflow

1. Map Metadata Reachability

  • Record the metadata endpoint, required headers, hop limits, session tokens, workload selectors, or path prefixes.
  • Note whether access comes from direct local calls, pod networking, SSRF, sidecar, or host-level routing.
  • Keep the reaching surface and the metadata endpoint in one chain.

2. Prove Credential Or Identity Issuance

  • Show how the metadata response becomes a token, temporary credential, signed identity doc, or platform-specific workload identity.
  • Record expiration, role name, subject, audience, issuer, or cloud account mapping that matters downstream.
  • Distinguish raw metadata from usable credential material.

3. Reduce To The Decisive Trust Path

  • Compress the result to the smallest sequence: reaching surface -> metadata call -> credential issued -> accepted cloud or cluster action.
  • State clearly whether the weakness lives in reachability, metadata config, role trust, downstream policy, or workload binding.
  • If the challenge narrows to RBAC or cluster mutation after credential issuance, switch back to the tighter control-plane skill.

Read This Reference

  • Load references/cloud-metadata-path.md for the reachability checklist, token checklist, and evidence packaging.
  • If the hard part is first proving a server-side fetch primitive, SSRF reachability, or internal endpoint traversal before metadata itself, prefer $competition-ssrf-metadata-pivot.

What To Preserve

  • Metadata endpoints, required headers, reachability path, issued tokens or creds, and accepted APIs
  • Role names, audiences, issuers, account bindings, and privilege-bearing actions
  • The smallest replayable metadata-to-privilege chain

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet, be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.