AgentStack
Browse Sign in
Browse Why AgentStack Sell Docs
Sign in
SKILL verified MIT Self-run

Competition K8s Control Plane

skill-zhaoxuya520-reverse-skill-competition-k8s-control-plane · by zhaoxuya520

Internal downstream skill for ctf-sandbox-orchestrator. CTF-sandbox workflow for Kubernetes API analysis, service-account trust, RBAC edges, admission and controller behavior, cluster secrets, workload mutation, and namespace-scoped drift. Use when the user asks to inspect kube API permissions, service-account tokens, RoleBinding or ClusterRoleBinding edges, admission webhooks, controller-created…

No reviews yet
0 installs
3 views
0.0% view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-zhaoxuya520-reverse-skill-competition-k8s-control-plane

✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • Prompt-injection patterns
  • Secret / credential exfiltration
  • Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • Untrusted network calls
  • Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • Network access No
  • Filesystem access No
  • Shell / process execution No
  • Environment & secrets No
  • Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

View the full security report →

Verified badge

Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.

AgentStack Verified badge Links to your public security report.
[![AgentStack Verified](https://agentstack.voostack.com/badges/verified.svg)](https://agentstack.voostack.com/security/report/skill-zhaoxuya520-reverse-skill-competition-k8s-control-plane)

Reliability & compatibility

Security review passed
0 installs to date
no reviews yet
1mo ago

Declared compatibility

Claude CodeClaude Desktop

Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.

Preview Execution monitoring

We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.

How agent discovery & health will work →
Are you the author of Competition K8s Control Plane? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

Competition K8s Control Plane

Use this skill only as a downstream specialization after $ctf-sandbox-orchestrator is already active and has established sandbox assumptions, node ownership, and evidence priorities. If that has not happened yet, return to $ctf-sandbox-orchestrator first.

Use this skill when the decisive path runs through Kubernetes control-plane state, API permissions, or controller behavior rather than a single container's runtime alone.

Reply in Simplified Chinese unless the user explicitly requests English.

Quick Start

  1. Separate manifest intent from live cluster state: API objects, mutations, controllers, secrets, and resulting workloads.
  2. Identify the active principal first: service account, kubeconfig identity, node credential, webhook, or controller.
  3. Map the smallest control-plane edge to its workload effect.
  4. Keep RBAC, service accounts, owner references, namespace boundaries, and secret consumers in compact evidence blocks.
  5. Reproduce the smallest cluster action that yields the decisive workload or secret effect.

Workflow

1. Map The API Trust Path

  • Record namespaces, service accounts, Roles, ClusterRoles, bindings, admission hooks, controllers, and the resources they can mutate.
  • Distinguish read access, create access, patch access, exec access, and secret access.
  • Keep principal, verb, resource, namespace, and resulting object in one chain.

2. Trace Mutation To Workload State

  • Show how an API action becomes a pod, volume mount, secret exposure, env injection, job run, or controller-created artifact.
  • Compare checked-in YAML against live objects after defaulting, admission mutation, or controller reconciliation.
  • Distinguish pod-runtime behavior from cluster-level mutation logic.

3. Reduce To The Decisive Cluster Path

  • Compress the result to the smallest chain: principal -> API permission -> mutated object -> resulting workload, secret, or route effect.
  • Keep kube objects, live describes, and consumed secret or config paths tied to the same namespace and controller.
  • If the problem narrows down to one container's mount or runtime deviation, switch back to the tighter container-runtime skill.

Read This Reference

  • Load references/k8s-control-plane.md for the RBAC checklist, controller checklist, and evidence packaging.
  • If the hard part is metadata-service reachability, workload identity, instance credentials, or metadata-derived privilege, prefer $competition-cloud-metadata-path.

What To Preserve

  • Namespace, service account, verb, resource kind, RoleBinding or ClusterRoleBinding, and owner reference chains
  • Admission mutations, generated workloads, mounted secrets, and controller-produced drift
  • The exact API action or object diff that creates the decisive effect

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet, be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.