AgentStack
Browse Sign in
Browse Why AgentStack Sell Docs
Sign in
SKILL verified Apache-2.0 Self-run

Review

skill-archcore-ai-plugin-review · by archcore-ai

Review branch changes against Archcore docs, or report project health. Use for 'review my branch', 'review the changes before merge', 'show status', 'documentation gaps', 'check if docs match code', 'close out the feature', 'ship the feature and close it out', or after a staleness warning. --drift for staleness detection, --deep for a full documentation audit. Not for creating docs — use /archcor…

No reviews yet
0 installs
0 views
view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-archcore-ai-plugin-review

✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • Prompt-injection patterns
  • Secret / credential exfiltration
  • Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • Untrusted network calls
  • Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • Network access No
  • Filesystem access No
  • Shell / process execution No
  • Environment & secrets No
  • Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

View the full security report →

Verified badge

Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.

AgentStack Verified badge Links to your public security report.
[![AgentStack Verified](https://agentstack.voostack.com/badges/verified.svg)](https://agentstack.voostack.com/security/report/skill-archcore-ai-plugin-review)

Reliability & compatibility

Security review passed
0 installs to date
no reviews yet
yesterday

Declared compatibility

Claude CodeClaude Desktop

Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.

Preview Execution monitoring

We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.

How agent discovery & health will work →
Are you the author of Review? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

/archcore:review

Review the changes on the current branch against the .archcore/ knowledge base, in both directions: whether the changed code still matches the documents that claim it, and whether the changed documents still match the code they describe. On the default branch, or with an empty diff, the skill reports project health instead. Write affinity: experience types — cpat and task-type land through the experience track.

When to use

  • "Review my branch" / "Review the changes before merge" → branch review
  • "Show status" / "How many docs do we have?" → project health dashboard
  • "Are any docs out of date?" / "Check if documentation matches the code" → --drift
  • "Audit the knowledge base" / "Documentation gaps?" → --deep
  • Session-start staleness warning appeared → --drift
  • "Close out the feature" / "Ship the feature and close it out" → closeout track

Not review:

  • Documenting a module, decision, or topic → /archcore:document
  • Planning a feature or initiative → /archcore:plan
  • First-time setup → /archcore:init

Routing table

| Signal | Route | |---|---| | No arguments, branch with changes | → branch review, steps 1–4 | | On the default branch, or empty diff | → project health dashboard (step 1 fallback) | | --drift | → actualize track (step 3); scope from step 1 when the branch boundary resolves, all documents on on-default-branch or empty-diff | | --deep | → actualize track over all documents, plus coverage and relation findings | | Path, tag, or scope argument | → the named scope narrows or replaces the branch scope | | Completion signals: "close out the feature", "ship the feature and close it out" — an explicit completion or acceptance verb, not mere branch readiness. A plain "review my branch" stays on branch review even for a merge-ready branch | → closeout track (skills/_shared/tracks/closeout.md), scope pre-filled from the step 1 branch-state block; exits into the step 4 experience offer | | Named track or type (actualize, experience, closeout, cpat, task-type) | → execute the named path without routing |

Execution

Load skills/_shared/gate-contract.md and skills/_shared/elicitation-contract.md before executing any track gate. Question budgets follow the elicitation contract.

IF .archcore/ does not exist, THEN announce initialization in one line and call mcp__archcore__init_project without asking a question. IF .archcore/ contains zero documents, THEN proceed on git and codebase grounding and report that zero documents were found.

Grounding. Search all three categories — vision, knowledge, experience — with mcp__archcore__search_documents / mcp__archcore__list_documents; never exclude a category from reads. Pass a type filter matched to the review moment — spec, rule, adr, doc, guide for claims on changed code; cpat, task-type for precedent; plan, prd, idea, rnd for the closeout track's plan-and-implements-chain scope — instead of relying on the global type ranking. When a found document has implements or related relations, pull the linked documents one hop across categories.

Global sources (only when present). If any list_documents / search_documents result carries global: true / read_only: true / source_kind: "global", load skills/_shared/globals.md. Never modify a global document and never add a relation to one. Exclude global documents from every local-health metric — counts, orphan detection, drift; you MAY add one separate line naming the mounted source and its document count.

Step 1: Branch scope

Resolve the branch work boundary per skills/_shared/branch-state.md — plain git, offline. On success, the branch-state output block (committed and uncommitted changes since the merge base) is the review scope. A path, tag, or scope argument narrows the changed-file list.

Handle every sentinel the contract defines:

| Sentinel | Response | |---|---| | no-repo | Request an explicit path or topic; review that scope without a diff. | | detached-head | State the detached state; request an explicit path, topic, or ref. | | no-default-branch | Request an explicit path or topic. | | no-merge-base | Request an explicit path or topic. | | on-default-branch | Report project health instead of a branch review. | | empty-diff | Report project health instead of a branch review. |

With --drift, the on-default-branch and empty-diff sentinels widen the actualize scope to all documents instead of the health fallback.

Project health fallback — compact dashboard, data only, no analysis:

  • document counts by category, by status, and by type (skip types with 0);
  • relation counts by type;
  • orphaned documents (no incoming or outgoing relations);
  • one-line issues summary (orphans, high draft count).

End with: For staleness detection, run /archcore:review --drift. For a full audit, run /archcore:review --deep.

Step 2: Bidirectional check

Over the branch scope, check both directions:

  1. Changed code versus the documents that claim it — search for documents that reference the changed paths, modules, or names; read each match with mcp__archcore__get_document; compare its claims against the changed code.
  2. Changed documents versus the code they describe — for each changed .archcore/ document, read the referenced code and compare.

Each conflict finding carries exactly one verdict: spec-wrong (the document is stale), code-wrong (the code violates a document that still stands), or ok (the pair matches on inspection). Cite the evidence — changed files, modification dates, content markers — with every non-ok verdict.

Step 3: Actualize gate

WHEN step 2 surfaces a drift signal — any spec-wrong or code-wrong finding — or the user passed --deep or --drift, route into the actualize track (skills/_shared/tracks/actualize.md) and run its gates: actualize.scope (pre-filled with the step 1 branch-state block), actualize.verdict, actualize.fix. With --deep, widen the scope to all documents and report coverage gaps, relation health, status, and consistency findings alongside the drift verdicts.

Step 4: Experience offer

WHEN the reviewed changes repeat an undocumented pattern, offer a cpat or task-type capture through the experience track (skills/_shared/tracks/experience.md): experience.detect establishes the repeated edit shape and its evidence; experience.offer asks once. The offer is optional — never force it; a decline writes nothing.

Delegation

  • The archcore-auditor agent collects findings read-only: document inventory, relation graph, drift and coverage signals. The agent never questions the user (a subagent MUST NOT conduct an interview, per skills/_shared/elicitation-contract.md) and never writes.
  • The main thread confirms every fix with the user and applies it via mcp__archcore__update_document, one document at a time, per the actualize.fix gate. The review skill MUST NOT edit code on this path — it reports a code-wrong finding without fixing it.

Result

  • Branch review: findings grouped by verdict — spec-wrong / code-wrong / ok — with evidence, applied fixes, and declined fixes.
  • Health fallback: the dashboard, data only.
  • Closeout: per-task verdicts from closeout.verify, applied and declined document updates from closeout.merge, and status transitions grouped applied / declined / skipped from closeout.accept.
  • Produced documents grouped by category — experience: a cpat or task-type draft from the experience offer; knowledge / vision: documents updated at actualize.fix or closeout.merge.

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet, be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.