Install
$ agentstack add skill-fourteenwm-ppc-ai-skills-lead-quality-recommendation-prioritization ✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.
Security review
✓ PassedNo issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →
- ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
- ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
- ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
- ✓ Untrusted network calls
- ✓ Known-malicious package signatures
What it can access
- ✓ Network access No
- ✓ Filesystem access No
- ✓ Shell / process execution No
- ✓ Environment & secrets No
- ✓ Dynamic code execution No
From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.
Verified badge
Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.
Reliability & compatibility
Declared compatibility
Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.
We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.
How agent discovery & health will work →About
Lead Quality Recommendation Prioritization Skill
Purpose: Provides standardized methodology for prioritizing and structuring lead quality recommendations with clear implementation timelines and success metrics.
Type: Domain knowledge skill (auto-invoked)
Core Principle: Actionable, Verified, Prioritized
Every recommendation must be:
- Verified - Confirmed as not already implemented
- Specific - Exact steps, not generic advice
- Prioritized - Clear timeline (Immediate/Medium/Long-term)
- Measurable - Expected impact quantified when possible
Anti-Pattern to Avoid:
- ❌ "Improve targeting" (too vague)
- ❌ "Add negative keywords" (already done? which keywords?)
- ❌ "Optimize campaign" (no specific action)
Correct Pattern:
- ✅ "Add
/blog/*to URL exclusions (not currently configured) - Expected to reduce conversions from blog pages by ~75%"
Three-Tier Priority System
🚨 Tier 1: IMMEDIATE ACTIONS (Implement Today)
Criteria for Immediate Priority:
- Quick wins (can be done in 3 red flags, severe quality issues)
- High impact, low effort
- No approvals or testing required
- Directly addresses root cause
Time Frame: Today (same day)
Examples:
- Adding URL exclusions for blog content
- Excluding mobile app placements
- Pausing underperforming campaigns
- Adding negative keywords for irrelevant queries
⚠️ Tier 2: MEDIUM-TERM ACTIONS (This Week)
Criteria for Medium Priority:
- Requires testing or validation
- Needs approval from client or stakeholder
- Medium effort (2-4 hours implementation)
- Strategic changes (bidding strategy, audience signals)
- Requires monitoring period before next step
Time Frame: Within 7 days
Examples:
- Adding conversion value rules
- Implementing audience signals
- Creating new campaigns or ad groups
- Adjusting budgets based on quality performance
- Setting up ad scheduling restrictions
ℹ️ Tier 3: LONG-TERM STRATEGIES (This Month)
Criteria for Long-term Priority:
- Strategic initiatives (requires planning)
- Requires development work (landing pages, tracking)
- Needs multiple stakeholder approvals
- High effort (>1 week implementation)
- Foundational changes to account structure
Time Frame: Within 30 days
Examples:
- Implementing offline conversion tracking
- Creating dedicated thank-you pages with quality differentiation
- Building new landing pages
- Restructuring campaign architecture
- Implementing CRM integrations
Recommendation Structure Template
Standard Recommendation Format
#### {Priority Emoji} {Action Number}. {Action Name}
**Current State:** {What exists now - be specific}
**Recommendation:** {Specific change to implement}
**Implementation Steps:**
1. {Step 1 - exact instruction}
2. {Step 2 - exact instruction}
3. {Step 3 - exact instruction}
**Expected Impact:**
- {Quantified metric if possible}
- {Timeline for seeing results}
**Verification Before Implementing:**
- [ ] Not already configured (checked {date})
- [ ] Technically feasible (confirmed {method})
- [ ] No conflicts with other campaigns
Recommendation Examples by Tier
Example 1: IMMEDIATE - URL Exclusions
#### 🚨 1. Exclude Blog/Community Content from Performance Max
**Current State:**
- No URL exclusions configured
- 76.2% of conversions (64 of 84) coming from `/blog/*` blog pages
- Blog content = moving tips, neighborhood guides (informational, not property-focused)
**Recommendation:**
Add content exclusions for blog/informational URLs to focus spend on property/conversion pages
**Implementation Steps:**
1. Navigate to Performance Max campaign settings
2. Go to "Content" → "Exclusions" → "Excluded content"
3. Add the following URL patterns:
- `*acme-plumbing.com/blog/*`
- `*acme-plumbing.com/blog/*`
- `*acme-plumbing.com/news/*`
4. Save changes
**Expected Impact:**
- Reduce conversions from blog traffic by ~75% (64 → 16 conversions)
- Improve lead quality by focusing on users viewing service pages
- May see 20-30% decrease in total conversions, but 50%+ improvement in show-up rate
- Should see impact within 3-5 days
**Verification:**
- ✅ Confirmed no URL exclusions currently configured (checked 2025-10-24)
- ✅ Blog URLs account for majority of low-quality conversions
- ✅ No risk to service page conversions (separate URL structure)
Example 2: MEDIUM - Conversion Value Rules
#### ⚠️ 2. Implement Conversion Value Rules Based on User Engagement
**Current State:**
- All conversions assigned equal value ($1 default)
- Bidding strategy = Maximize Conversion Value
- GA4 shows wide variance in user engagement (some 5 min sessions)
- Algorithm can't differentiate high-engagement vs low-engagement conversions
**Recommendation:**
Create conversion value rules that assign higher value to engaged users
**Implementation Steps:**
1. Go to Tools → Conversions → Select "contact_form_submission"
2. Click "Value rules" → "New rule"
3. Create rules based on conditions:
- **Rule 1 (High Value):** IF session duration >120 sec AND pages/session >3 → Value = $5
- **Rule 2 (Medium Value):** IF session duration 30-120 sec → Value = $3
- **Rule 3 (Low Value):** IF session duration • Exclude mobile app placements• Add negative keywords for irrelevant terms | 🚨 High | Media Buyer | ⏳ Pending |
| Week 2 | • Implement conversion value rules• Add audience signals (in-market potential customers)• Monitor quality improvements | ⚠️ Medium | Media Buyer | ⏳ Pending |
| Week 3 | • Review conversion value distribution• Adjust rules based on learning• Begin offline conversion planning | ⚠️ Medium | Media Buyer + Client | ⏳ Pending |
| Week 4 | • Initiate CRM integration for offline conversions• Build data pipeline• Create "tour_attended" conversion action | ℹ️ Low | Developer + Media Buyer | ⏳ Pending |
Success Metrics & Monitoring Template
Purpose: Define how to measure if recommendations are working
## Success Metrics & Monitoring
**Primary KPIs:**
1. **Show-up Rate** (tours attended ÷ tours booked)
- Current: ~20%
- Target: >50% within 30 days
- Measurement: Client CRM data
2. **Cost per Attended Tour** (spend ÷ tours attended)
- Current: ~$250 (estimated, based on 20% show-up rate)
- Target: 1 week implementation or development work?
└─ YES → ℹ️ LONG-TERM PRIORITY
└─ NO → ⚠️ MEDIUM PRIORITY (moderate effort)
Quality Checks Before Recommending
Pre-Flight Checklist:
Before adding any recommendation to final report:
- [ ] Verified not already implemented (checked campaign settings on {date})
- [ ] Specific and actionable (not generic advice like "improve quality")
- [ ] Implementation steps provided (exact instructions, not just "do this")
- [ ] Expected impact quantified (% change, timeline, metric)
- [ ] Priority tier assigned (Immediate / Medium / Long-term)
- [ ] Verification evidence documented (how we confirmed it's not already done)
- [ ] No conflicts with other recommendations (actions don't contradict each other)
- [ ] Technically feasible (confirmed possible in Google Ads platform)
If ANY checklist item fails:
- Do NOT include recommendation
- Either fix the gap (add missing details) or document in "What Was Ruled Out"
Integration with Investigation Workflow
Pre-Recommendations (Pattern Analysis & Cross-Reference):
- lead-quality-pattern-analysis - Identifies red flags and issues
- ga4-campaign-cross-reference - Verifies what's already configured vs gaps
During Recommendations (This Skill):
- Apply prioritization decision tree to each finding
- Structure recommendations using templates
- Create "What Was Ruled Out" documentation
- Build implementation timeline
Post-Recommendations (Output):
- client-communication-standards - Format final report
- Include success metrics and monitoring plan
- Deliver with clear next steps
Real-World Example: Example PMAX Prioritization
Findings from Analysis:
- 5 red flags detected (🚨 Severe)
- 3 configuration gaps confirmed
- 2 hypotheses ruled out
Recommendations Generated:
🚨 IMMEDIATE (3 actions):
- Add
/blog/*URL exclusions → Addresses 76.2% blog traffic - Reduce budget during seasonal decline → Preserves budget for better timing
- Pause AI Max campaign → Underperforming, cannibalizing Pmax budget
⚠️ MEDIUM (2 actions):
- Implement conversion value rules → Requires testing, client awareness
- Review mobile app placements → Requires deeper placement report analysis
ℹ️ LONG-TERM (2 actions):
- Dual thank-you page setup → Requires client dev work
- Offline conversion tracking → Requires CRM integration (4-6 weeks)
❌ RULED OUT (2 hypotheses):
- Geographic targeting changes → Verified targeting correct, IP geolocation issue
- Add negative keywords → Already comprehensive list configured
Implementation Timeline:
- Week 1: All IMMEDIATE actions completed
- Week 2-3: MEDIUM actions implemented and monitored
- Week 4+: LONG-TERM planning initiated
Result:
Clear action plan with specific next steps, verified recommendations, and documented due diligence (ruled-out items)
When to Use This Skill
Auto-Invoked When:
- Generating lead quality recommendations
- Prioritizing investigation findings
- Creating implementation timelines
- Documenting "What Was Ruled Out"
- User asks "what should I do about {lead quality issue}"
Manual Invocation:
- Campaign audits (organizing findings)
- Client reports (structuring recommendations)
- Monthly reviews (prioritizing fixes)
Related Skills & Documentation
Related Skills:
- lead-quality-pattern-analysis - Identifies issues that become recommendations
- ga4-campaign-cross-reference - Verifies what's already done (prevents duplicate recommendations)
- client-communication-standards - Formatting for final report delivery
- budget-recommendation-calculator - Similar prioritization framework for budget changes
Related Documentation:
- Example PMAX GA4 Analysis (example of full recommendation structure)
- GA4 Cross-Analysis System Overview
- Client communication examples
Created: 2025-11-01 Extracted From: ga4-lead-quality-investigation-agent.md (Prioritize Recommendations & Output sections) Status: Active
Source & license
This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.
- Author: fourteenwm
- Source: fourteenwm/ppc-ai-skills
- License: MIT
Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.
Reviews
No reviews yet, be the first.
Write a review
Versions
- v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.