Install
$ agentstack add skill-gsarig-skills-code-review-content ✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.
Security review
✓ PassedNo issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →
- ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
- ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
- ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
- ✓ Untrusted network calls
- ✓ Known-malicious package signatures
What it can access
- ✓ Network access No
- ✓ Filesystem access No
- ✓ Shell / process execution No
- ✓ Environment & secrets No
- ✓ Dynamic code execution No
From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.
Verified badge
Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.
Reliability & compatibility
Declared compatibility
Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.
We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.
How agent discovery & health will work →About
Steps
1. Source and diff
Read ~/.claude/skills/code-review/references/review-shared.md and follow its source detection and diff fetching sections. If --source and the corresponding identifier args were passed, use those and skip any prompting.
2. Load voice reference (conditional)
If the project defines a voice or style guide (a styleguide doc, a writing-voice skill, or a CLAUDE.md section on tone), read it and apply its rules throughout the review.
3. Review
Read ~/.claude/skills/code-review/references/review-checklist.md first for any general principles.
Focus on:
- Voice consistency. When a voice guide is loaded, follow its rules. Otherwise match the tone of adjacent prose.
- Grammar and tense agreement.
- Factual claims that can be verified (dates, numbers, names, attributions). Flag those you cannot verify and ask the user to confirm rather than guessing.
- Dead or wrong links. Fetch reachable URLs if helpful; flag any you cannot verify.
- Structure and flow. Section ordering, missing or redundant transitions, headings that don't match their content.
- Redundant phrasing.
- Accidental tone shifts within or across paragraphs.
Do not flag established prose-style preferences if they are already consistent with adjacent posts. Honour the common review rules in the shared doc.
4. Output
Format per the output section of ~/.claude/skills/code-review/references/review-shared.md. The linter and GitHub Actions hash verification sections do not apply to content reviews; do not run those steps.
Source & license
This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.
- Author: gsarig
- Source: gsarig/skills
- License: MIT
Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.
Reviews
No reviews yet, be the first.
Write a review
Versions
- v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.