Performance Review
Use this skill when writing performance achievement documents, self-assessments, peer feedback, PA documentation, or any career review writing. Trigger on keywords: performance review, PA, self-assessment, peer feedback, performance achievement, review cycle, annual review, accomplishments, sprint contribution.
Install
$ agentstack add skill-jamestorrevillas-dev-skills-performance-review ✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.
Security review
✓ PassedNo issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →
- ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
- ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
- ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
- ✓ Untrusted network calls
- ✓ Known-malicious package signatures
What it can access
- ✓ Network access No
- ✓ Filesystem access No
- ✓ Shell / process execution No
- ✓ Environment & secrets No
- ✓ Dynamic code execution No
From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.
Verified badge
Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.
Links to your public security report.[](https://agentstack.voostack.com/security/report/skill-jamestorrevillas-dev-skills-performance-review) Reliability & compatibility
Declared compatibility
Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.
We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.
How agent discovery & health will work →About
Performance Review Writing
Core Principles
- Write only what you actually did — no inflation, no filler phrases
- Use "Assisted in..." when not the primary contributor
- Quantify where possible: coverage %, stories completed, time reduced
- Never use: "demonstrating strong commitment to...", "showcasing my passion for..."
- For peer feedback with limited collaboration: keep general, honest, safe
Self-Assessment Format
Accomplishment Writing Pattern
WEAK: "Worked on the BTT module"
STRONG: "Built Query Clarity Assessment Agent (US-2111704),
achieving 95%+ unit and integration test coverage"
WEAK: "Helped with UI work"
STRONG: "Assisted in BTT UI/UX enhancements (US-2068094),
contributing to LaunchDarkly feature flag implementation"Personal Reflection (One Flowing Paragraph)
- Write in first person, conversational, honest
- Cover: what you learned, what challenged you, what you want next
- Avoid: bullet points, headers, passive voice, corporate filler
Peer Feedback Templates
Strength:
[Name] consistently [specific behavior] which [impact].
For example, [concrete but general example].Growth Area (constructive):
One area where [Name] could develop is [skill/behavior].
I believe strengthening this would [positive outcome].Limited Collaboration Rule
- Keep it general: work ethic, communication style, team presence
- Do NOT mention specific story IDs
- Only state what you can directly verify
Asking for Feedback
Hi [Name], completing my performance review and would value your input.
Two questions if you have a moment:
1. One thing I did well you'd want me to keep doing
2. One area where I could improve
Even a few sentences helps. Thanks!Pre-Submission Checklist
- [ ] Achievements are quantified where possible
- [ ] "Assisted in" used for non-primary contributions
- [ ] No filler phrases remain
- [ ] Personal reflection is prose, not bullets
- [ ] Required fields (EID, dates) are filled in
- [ ] Nothing is overstated
Source & license
This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.
- Author: jamestorrevillas
- Source: jamestorrevillas/dev-skills
- License: MIT
Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.
Reviews
No reviews yet, be the first.
Write a review
Versions
- v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.