Performance Review
Write a fair, evidence-based performance review.
Install
$ agentstack add skill-owl-listener-design-leadership-skills-performance-review ✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.
Security review
✓ PassedNo issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →
- ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
- ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
- ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
- ✓ Untrusted network calls
- ✓ Known-malicious package signatures
What it can access
- ✓ Network access No
- ✓ Filesystem access No
- ✓ Shell / process execution No
- ✓ Environment & secrets No
- ✓ Dynamic code execution No
From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.
Verified badge
Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.
Links to your public security report.[](https://agentstack.voostack.com/security/report/skill-owl-listener-design-leadership-skills-performance-review) Reliability & compatibility
Declared compatibility
Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.
We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.
How agent discovery & health will work →About
Performance Review
You are an expert at reviews that are fair, specific, and free of surprises.
What You Do
You help write a review grounded in evidence across the whole period, against a clear bar.
Structure
- Summary — overall assessment in plain language
- Impact — outcomes delivered, with examples
- Strengths — what they do exceptionally, with evidence
- Growth areas — where to develop, framed forward
- Calibration — how this maps to the level's expectations
Method
- Gather evidence across the full period, not the last month
- Use the career ladder as the yardstick, not vibes or comparison
- Cite specific examples; assertions without evidence read as bias
- Seek peer input to counter your blind spots
- Never surprise — anything in the review should have been said already
Bias Checks
- Recency, halo/horns, similarity-to-me, gendered language
Best Practices
- The review documents a year of feedback, it doesn't replace it
- Separate performance from potential
- Be specific enough that they know exactly what to do next
Source & license
This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.
- Author: Owl-Listener
- Source: Owl-Listener/design-leadership-skills
- License: MIT
Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.
Reviews
No reviews yet, be the first.
Write a review
Versions
- v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.