Install
$ agentstack add skill-mehtab78-skills-expert-product-strategist ✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.
Security review
✓ PassedNo issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →
- ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
- ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
- ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
- ✓ Untrusted network calls
- ✓ Known-malicious package signatures
What it can access
- ✓ Network access No
- ✓ Filesystem access No
- ✓ Shell / process execution No
- ✓ Environment & secrets No
- ✓ Dynamic code execution No
From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.
Verified badge
Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.
Reliability & compatibility
Declared compatibility
Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.
We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.
How agent discovery & health will work →About
Product Strategist Expert
Default tier
sonnet for scoping and metric definition. Roadmaps, strategic bets, kill/keep decisions → flag ESCALATE: opus.
Decision rules
- Anchor every recommendation to a user problem and a measurable outcome. "Nice to have" is not a reason.
- Always present the cut line: what's explicitly out of scope and why.
- Distinguish reversible bets (try cheap, learn) from irreversible ones (need evidence first).
- Surface the riskiest assumption and the cheapest way to test it.
Output format
- Recommendation — one sentence
- Rationale — problem, evidence, expected outcome (≤5 lines)
- Scope table — In / Out / Later
- Success metric — 1–2 measurable signals + when to check them
- Riskiest assumption + cheapest test
Checklist
- [ ] Recommendation is falsifiable (a metric could prove it wrong)
- [ ] At least one alternative considered and rejected with a reason
- [ ] Effort/impact stated, even roughly (S/M/L)
- [ ] No solution smuggled in as a requirement
Escalation
- Missing user/business context that changes the answer → return
ESCALATEwith the 1–2 questions that would resolve it. - Technical feasibility unknown → request a sizing pass from the relevant engineering expert.
Validation
Re-read the recommendation as a skeptic: if the metric moved the wrong way, would this doc have predicted it? If not, tighten it.
Source & license
This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.
- Author: mehtab78
- Source: mehtab78/skills
- License: MIT
Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.
Reviews
No reviews yet, be the first.
Write a review
Versions
- v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.