Install
$ agentstack add skill-mohitagw15856-pm-claude-skills-client-discovery ✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.
Security review
✓ PassedNo issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →
- ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
- ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
- ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
- ✓ Untrusted network calls
- ✓ Known-malicious package signatures
What it can access
- ✓ Network access No
- ✓ Filesystem access No
- ✓ Shell / process execution No
- ✓ Environment & secrets No
- ✓ Dynamic code execution No
From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.
Verified badge
Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.
Reliability & compatibility
Declared compatibility
Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.
We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.
How agent discovery & health will work →About
Client Discovery Skill
The brief a client gives you is rarely the real problem — and the difference is where good consulting (and accurate scoping) lives. This skill preps a discovery session that gets beneath the stated ask to the actual problem, qualifies whether it's a fit (budget, authority, timeline), and pins the success criteria — so you scope and price accurately and write a proposal that lands.
Required Inputs
Ask for these only if they aren't already provided:
- The prospect — who they are, the stated ask, and how they found you.
- Your offering — what you do, so questions probe fit.
- What you need to decide — go/no-go, scope, and price.
Output Format
Discovery Plan: [prospect]
1. The goal of the call — qualify + uncover the real problem + earn the right to propose. Not to pitch.
2. Get to the real problem — questions that move past the symptom to the cause and the stakes:
- "What made this a priority now?" · "What have you already tried?" · "What happens if you do nothing?" · "How will you know this is solved?" · "Who else is affected / involved?"
- Use 5-whys-style follow-ups to reach the root, not the presenting issue.
3. Qualify (fit) — surface, tactfully:
- Budget — is there one, and roughly what range? ("Have you set aside budget / a range in mind?")
- Authority — who decides and signs? Are they on the call?
- Timeline — when do they need it, and why that date?
- Decision process — what happens after this call; who else weighs in.
4. Success criteria — the concrete outcome that = success, in their terms. (This becomes the proposal's objectives.)
5. Red flags — watch for: no budget/authority, "just exploring," scope that balloons mid-call, shopping many vendors on price, unrealistic timeline. Note how to handle each.
6. Close & next step — how to summarise what you heard (confirm understanding) and set up the proposal ("I'll send a proposal with options by [date]").
Quality Checks
- [ ] Questions dig past the stated ask to the root problem and the cost of inaction
- [ ] Budget, authority, timeline, and decision process are all surfaced (tactfully)
- [ ] Success criteria are captured in the client's own terms
- [ ] Red flags are anticipated with a handling plan
- [ ] Ends by confirming understanding and setting up the proposal
Anti-Patterns
- [ ] Do not pitch during discovery — listen and diagnose; the proposal is where you prescribe
- [ ] Do not accept the stated problem at face value — the real one (and real scope) is usually underneath
- [ ] Do not skip qualifying budget/authority — a beautiful proposal to someone who can't buy is wasted
- [ ] Do not ignore red flags to win work — a bad-fit client costs more than the fee
- [ ] Do not end without a confirmed next step and date — momentum dies in the gap
Based On
Consulting discovery / sales-qualification practice — root-cause questioning, BANT-style qualification, outcome-defined scoping.
Source & license
This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.
- Author: mohitagw15856
- Source: mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills
- License: MIT
- Homepage: https://mohitagw15856.github.io/pm-claude-skills/
Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.
Reviews
No reviews yet, be the first.
Write a review
Versions
- v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.