AgentStack
Browse Sign in
Browse Why AgentStack Sell Docs
Sign in
SKILL verified MIT Self-run

Retention Analysis

skill-mohitagw15856-pm-claude-skills-retention-analysis · by mohitagw15856

Structure a retention analysis, churn investigation, or engagement deep-dive for any product team. Use when asked to analyse user retention, investigate churn, measure DAU/MAU, or build a retention improvement plan. Produces a retention snapshot with root cause hypotheses, aha-moment correlation, and prioritised interventions.

No reviews yet
0 installs
3 views
0.0% view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-mohitagw15856-pm-claude-skills-retention-analysis

✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • Prompt-injection patterns
  • Secret / credential exfiltration
  • Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • Untrusted network calls
  • Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • Network access No
  • Filesystem access No
  • Shell / process execution No
  • Environment & secrets No
  • Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

View the full security report →

Verified badge

Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.

AgentStack Verified badge Links to your public security report.
[![AgentStack Verified](https://agentstack.voostack.com/badges/verified.svg)](https://agentstack.voostack.com/security/report/skill-mohitagw15856-pm-claude-skills-retention-analysis)

Reliability & compatibility

Security review passed
0 installs to date
no reviews yet
1mo ago

Declared compatibility

Claude CodeClaude Desktop

Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.

Preview Execution monitoring

We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.

How agent discovery & health will work →
Are you the author of Retention Analysis? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

Retention Analysis Skill

Diagnose why users leave, identify what keeps them, and recommend specific, testable interventions — not vague "improve onboarding" suggestions.

Retention Fundamentals

The retention curve has two components:

  1. Steepness of initial drop (D1–D7) — onboarding problem
  2. Long-term floor level — product-market fit indicator

A product with PMF has a retention curve that flattens. If it trends to zero, you have a PMF problem, not an onboarding problem. Name this distinction explicitly.


Retention Metrics Definitions

| Metric | Formula | What It Tells You | |---|---|---| | D1 Retention | Users who return on day 2 ÷ new users day 1 | Quality of first experience | | D7 Retention | Users active on day 8 ÷ users who joined 7 days ago | Early habit formation | | D30 Retention | Users active on day 31 ÷ users who joined 30 days ago | Product-market fit signal | | DAU/MAU Ratio | Daily active users ÷ monthly active users | Stickiness (>20% good, >50% excellent) | | Churn Rate | Users lost in period ÷ users at start of period | Monthly or annual | | Net Revenue Retention | MRR at end of period ÷ MRR at start (same cohort) | Revenue health including expansion |


Retention Investigation Framework

Step 1: Segment the problem

Don't analyse "retention" — analyse retention for specific cohorts:

  • New vs returning users
  • Paid vs free
  • Acquisition channel (organic vs paid vs referral)
  • Onboarding path completed vs not
  • Feature usage (power users vs lurkers)

Step 2: Find the inflection points

Where does the drop happen? D1? D7? Month 3?

  • D1 drop → First session experience
  • D7 drop → Habit loop not formed
  • D30 drop → Value not delivered at depth
  • Month 3+ drop → Boredom, competition, or lifecycle event

Step 3: Identify the "aha moment" correlation

Which early behaviour predicts long-term retention?

  • Run correlation: users who did [X] in first 7 days vs 30-day retention
  • Common patterns: connected an integration, invited a teammate, completed a core action N times

Step 4: Qualify the churn

Interview churned users — never skip this. Survey data alone is insufficient.

  • "What was the trigger that led you to cancel/stop?"
  • "What were you trying to accomplish that you couldn't?"
  • "What would need to change for you to come back?"

Output Format

Retention Analysis — [Product/Segment] — [Date]

Question: [Specific retention question being answered] Period Analysed: [Date range] Segment: [Which users]


Current Retention Snapshot:

| Metric | Current | Industry Benchmark | Status | |---|---|---|---| | D1 Retention | [X%] | 25–40% | 🔴/🟡/🟢 | | D7 Retention | [X%] | 10–25% | 🔴/🟡/🟢 | | D30 Retention | [X%] | 5–15% | 🔴/🟡/🟢 | | DAU/MAU | [X%] | 10–20% typical | 🔴/🟡/🟢 |

Retention Curve Shape: [Flattening / Still declining / Trending to zero] PMF Signal: [Strong / Weak / Absent — based on curve shape]


Root Cause Hypotheses:

| Hypothesis | Evidence | Confidence | Test | |---|---|---|---| | [Cause] | [Data point] | H/M/L | [How to validate] |

"Aha Moment" Correlation: Users who [specific action] in first [N] days retain at [X%] vs [Y%] for those who don't.


Recommended Interventions:

| Intervention | Target Drop | Expected Lift | Effort | Priority | |---|---|---|---|---| | [Specific change] | D1 / D7 / D30 | [X%] | S/M/L | 1/2/3 |

Monitoring Plan:

  • Metric to track: [X]
  • Review cadence: [Weekly / Monthly]
  • Alert threshold: [If X drops below Y, investigate immediately]

Required Inputs

Ask the user for these if not provided:

  • Product and business model (SaaS / consumer app / marketplace / other)
  • Current retention metrics (D1, D7, D30 if available)
  • Segment to analyse (all users / paid / free / a specific cohort)
  • Key question to answer (why is retention dropping? what drives retention?)
  • Available data (analytics events, churn surveys, interview notes)

Quality Checks

  • [ ] Retention curve shape is diagnosed (flattening vs trending to zero = PMF vs onboarding)
  • [ ] Cohorts are segmented before analysis (not all users lumped together)
  • [ ] "Aha moment" correlation is identified or flagged as unknown
  • [ ] Interventions are specific (not "improve onboarding")
  • [ ] Churned user interviews are recommended (not just data analysis)
  • [ ] Monitoring plan includes an alert threshold

Anti-Patterns

  • [ ] Do not recommend "improve onboarding" without specifying what specific step to change and why
  • [ ] Do not analyse retention without segmenting by cohort — aggregate retention curves hide cohort-specific patterns
  • [ ] Do not treat DAU/MAU below 5% as a retention problem — at that level, it is a product-market fit problem
  • [ ] Do not skip qualitative research — churned user interviews reveal reasons that quantitative data cannot
  • [ ] Do not set a monitoring alert without specifying the threshold that triggers it

Guidelines

  • Never recommend "improve onboarding" without specifying what to change and why
  • Benchmark against industry — consumer apps, SaaS, and marketplaces have very different retention norms
  • If DAU/MAU is below 5%, that's a PMF conversation, not a retention tactics conversation
  • Always recommend talking to churned users — no amount of data replaces understanding the reason

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet, be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.