AgentStack
SKILL verified MIT Self-run

Cro Auditor

skill-thatrebeccarae-claude-marketing-cro-auditor · by thatrebeccarae

Conversion Rate Optimization auditing for landing pages, signup flows, checkout funnels, forms, and CTAs. Identifies friction points, runs heuristic evaluations, produces prioritized recommendations using ICE/PIE frameworks. Use when the user asks about conversion optimization, funnel analysis, landing page audits, form optimization, CTA testing, or checkout improvement.

No reviews yet
0 installs
15 views
0.0% view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-thatrebeccarae-claude-marketing-cro-auditor

✓ scanned · ✓ verified — works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • Prompt-injection patterns
  • Secret / credential exfiltration
  • Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • Untrusted network calls
  • Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • Network access No
  • Filesystem access No
  • Shell / process execution No
  • Environment & secrets No
  • Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

Are you the author of Cro Auditor? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

CRO Auditor

Conversion Rate Optimization — audit landing pages, funnels, forms, and CTAs for friction and opportunities.

Install

git clone https://github.com/thatrebeccarae/claude-marketing.git && cp -r claude-marketing/skills/cro-auditor ~/.claude/skills/

Audit Framework

Heuristic Evaluation (LIFT Model)

Score each page element on 6 dimensions:

| Factor | Question | Increases/Decreases Conversion | |--------|----------|-------------------------------| | Value Proposition | Is the benefit clear and compelling? | Increases | | Relevance | Does this match what brought the user here? | Increases | | Clarity | Is the message and action obvious? | Increases | | Urgency | Is there a reason to act now? | Increases | | Anxiety | Are there concerns about taking action? | Decreases | | Distraction | Are there elements competing for attention? | Decreases |

Page-Level Audit Checklist

Above the Fold
  • [ ] Value proposition visible without scrolling
  • [ ] Primary CTA visible and prominent
  • [ ] Hero image/visual supports the message (not stock photo)
  • [ ] Navigation does not distract from primary conversion goal
  • [ ] Page loads in under 2.5 seconds (LCP)
Value Proposition
  • [ ] Headline communicates specific benefit (not feature)
  • [ ] Subheadline provides supporting detail
  • [ ] Unique differentiator is clear (why you vs alternatives)
  • [ ] Social proof near the value proposition (logos, count, rating)
Call to Action
  • [ ] CTA text is action-oriented and specific ("Start Free Trial" not "Submit")
  • [ ] CTA button contrasts with page design (stands out visually)
  • [ ] Single primary CTA per page section (no competing actions)
  • [ ] CTA appears multiple times on long pages (top, middle, bottom)
  • [ ] Microcopy near CTA reduces anxiety ("No credit card required")
Social Proof
  • [ ] Customer logos (if B2B)
  • [ ] Testimonials with real names, photos, and specific results
  • [ ] Case studies or metrics ("Helped 5,000+ companies increase revenue by 34%")
  • [ ] Trust badges (security, certifications, awards)
  • [ ] User count or activity ("Join 50,000+ marketers")
Forms
  • [ ] Minimum fields necessary (every field reduces conversion 5-10%)
  • [ ] Labels above fields (not placeholder-only)
  • [ ] Inline validation with helpful error messages
  • [ ] Progress indicator for multi-step forms
  • [ ] Autofill enabled (autocomplete attributes)
  • [ ] Mobile-friendly input types (tel, email, number)
Friction & Anxiety
  • [ ] No unexpected costs or requirements revealed late
  • [ ] Privacy policy and terms linked (not gating)
  • [ ] Money-back guarantee or free trial clearly stated
  • [ ] Contact information visible (phone, chat, email)
  • [ ] FAQ section addressing common objections

Funnel Analysis

Funnel Mapping
Awareness → Interest → Desire → Action → Retention
   ↓          ↓          ↓        ↓          ↓
 Ad/SEO → Landing → Pricing → Signup → Onboarding
            Page      Page      Form      Flow

For each stage:

  1. Traffic volume: How many users enter this stage?
  2. Drop-off rate: What percentage leave without advancing?
  3. Top exit pages: Where exactly do users abandon?
  4. Friction indicators: Time on page, scroll depth, rage clicks
Conversion Benchmarks

| Page Type | Good | Average | Poor | |-----------|------|---------|------| | Landing page (paid traffic) | >5% | 2-5% | 3% | 1-3% | 25% | 10-25% | 3% | 1.5-3% | 25% | 10-25% | 5% | 2-5% | 10% | 5-10% | <5% |

Prioritization Frameworks

ICE Score

| Dimension | Definition | Scale | |-----------|-----------|-------| | Impact | How much will this change improve conversion? | 1-10 | | Confidence | How sure are we this will work? | 1-10 | | Ease | How easy is it to implement? | 1-10 |

ICE Score = (Impact + Confidence + Ease) / 3

PIE Score

| Dimension | Definition | Scale | |-----------|-----------|-------| | Potential | How much room for improvement? | 1-10 | | Importance | How valuable is the traffic to this page? | 1-10 | | Ease | How easy is it to run a test? | 1-10 |

PIE Score = (Potential + Importance + Ease) / 3

Audit Output Format

Executive Summary

  • Current conversion rate vs benchmark
  • Top 3 conversion killers identified
  • Estimated revenue impact of fixes
  • Quick wins (implementable in <1 day)

Issue Format

**Issue:** [What is wrong]
**Location:** [Page/element affected]
**Impact:** [HIGH/MEDIUM/LOW] — [Estimated conversion impact]
**Evidence:** [Data, heuristic principle, or benchmark comparison]
**Fix:** [Specific recommendation]
**Test:** [A/B test hypothesis: "Changing X will increase Y by Z%"]
**ICE Score:** [X/10]

A/B Test Recommendations

For each recommendation, provide:

  • Hypothesis: If we [change], then [metric] will [improve/increase] because [reason]
  • Primary metric: The conversion metric to measure
  • Minimum sample size: Based on current traffic and expected effect size
  • Test duration: Minimum days to reach significance (usually 2-4 weeks)

Common Conversion Killers

  1. Slow page load — Every 100ms delay reduces conversion by 1%
  2. Unclear value proposition — Visitor cannot answer "What is this and why should I care?" in 5 seconds
  3. Too many form fields — Each additional field reduces completion by 5-10%
  4. Weak CTA — Generic text ("Submit", "Click Here") vs specific ("Start Free Trial")
  5. No social proof — 92% of consumers read reviews before purchasing
  6. Hidden costs — Unexpected shipping/fees are the #1 reason for cart abandonment
  7. Competing CTAs — Multiple equal-weight actions create decision paralysis
  8. Mobile friction — Tiny buttons, horizontal scroll, slow load on mobile
  9. Trust deficit — No security badges, reviews, or contact info
  10. Exit without capture — No email capture, exit intent, or remarketing pixel

Integration with Other Skills

  • google-analytics — Pull conversion data to ground CRO recommendations in real metrics
  • landing-page-optimizer — Deep-dive on specific landing pages (when built)
  • a-b-testing-framework — Design and analyze tests for CRO recommendations (when built)
  • pro-report-builder — Generate professional CRO audit deliverable

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet — be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.